<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IM PRO registration or IM PRO loyalty card?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.graemestewart.me/im-pro-registration-or-im-pro-loyalty-card/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.graemestewart.me/im-pro-registration-or-im-pro-loyalty-card/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 17:07:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Say NO To Drafting » Could WTC licences record drafting points?</title>
		<link>http://www.graemestewart.me/im-pro-registration-or-im-pro-loyalty-card/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Say NO To Drafting » Could WTC licences record drafting points?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 22:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.graemestewart.me/?p=53#comment-4</guid>
		<description>[...] Officially this is to compliment their new anti-doping program and to improve the quality of competition, unofficially I have my own ideas. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Officially this is to compliment their new anti-doping program and to improve the quality of competition, unofficially I have my own ideas. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maryka</title>
		<link>http://www.graemestewart.me/im-pro-registration-or-im-pro-loyalty-card/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>maryka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 09:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.graemestewart.me/?p=53#comment-3</guid>
		<description>I actually do think the AG standard will go up (albeit in a few years after the new system takes its toll).  To get within 5% (slots) or 8% (money) of the WINNER&#039;S time in a race to qualify is a huge change from 10% of the 2nd-place time which has been the system up til now.  And the slots will be more toughly contested, no more cruising to a 5th place finish for that last Kona slot well off the winner&#039;s pace because your nearest competitor is so far back it doesn&#039;t matter what time you put in.

There are a lot of mediocre pros who would make awesome age-groupers that will want to get to Kona some way or another -- many of them will drop down to AG again once they realise there&#039;s no chance they&#039;ll ever get a slot via the pro route. 

Personally I think this is a good thing for the sport... if you look at this year&#039;s Kona results, nearly 75% of the pro field finished *behind* the top 10 age-groupers and that&#039;s just wrong.  Either the pros are elite -- like they are in every other sport in the world -- or they aren&#039;t.  This is a step in the right direction to make the elites really be elite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually do think the AG standard will go up (albeit in a few years after the new system takes its toll).  To get within 5% (slots) or 8% (money) of the WINNER&#8217;S time in a race to qualify is a huge change from 10% of the 2nd-place time which has been the system up til now.  And the slots will be more toughly contested, no more cruising to a 5th place finish for that last Kona slot well off the winner&#8217;s pace because your nearest competitor is so far back it doesn&#8217;t matter what time you put in.</p>
<p>There are a lot of mediocre pros who would make awesome age-groupers that will want to get to Kona some way or another &#8212; many of them will drop down to AG again once they realise there&#8217;s no chance they&#8217;ll ever get a slot via the pro route. </p>
<p>Personally I think this is a good thing for the sport&#8230; if you look at this year&#8217;s Kona results, nearly 75% of the pro field finished *behind* the top 10 age-groupers and that&#8217;s just wrong.  Either the pros are elite &#8212; like they are in every other sport in the world &#8212; or they aren&#8217;t.  This is a step in the right direction to make the elites really be elite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
